linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/12] firmware: arm_ffa: Move comment before the field it is documenting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:49:56 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Andrew Walbran <qwandor@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] firmware: arm_ffa: Move comment before the field
 it is documenting

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:53:08AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > 
> > This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
> >
> Not sure how that happened :). Anyways,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> 
> I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup
> to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later.
> The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the
> driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself.
> 
> I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts
> or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes
> are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible.
> 
> Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't
> have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts.

You're asking me to merge my own patches? Of course I can do that :D

Cheers,

Will