[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e8217f6-4eec-4793-637d-436a429c9aad@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 19:26:59 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Space Meyer <spm@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Deal with nested sleeps in kvm_vcpu_block()
On 12/2/22 16:52, Space Meyer wrote:
> The bug doesn't seem to be easily reproducible, but looking at the
> code this should also be applicable for the upstream 6.0, 5.15, 5.10,
> 5.4, 4.19 and 4.14 branches, which have not received a backport of
> 26844fe.
>
> Do you think this is all we should do? My conclusion from the LWN
> article was, that we should avoid the set_current_state ->
> conditional -> schedule pattern when possible as well.
Yes, the bug is there but unfortunately the backport is not easy. I
don't really feel confident backporting the fix to older kernels; even
if it is apparently just a couple lines of code, event handling is very
delicate and has had a lot of changes recently.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists