[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfdfd5df-9b5d-f4c1-91fe-e0443819fa7e@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:39:42 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
jarkko@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: zhiquan1.li@...el.com, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/18] x86/sgx: Add 'struct sgx_epc_lru_lists' to
encapsulate lru list(s)
On 12/2/22 10:36, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> Introduce a data structure to wrap the existing reclaimable list
> and its spinlock in a struct to minimize the code changes needed
> to handle multiple LRUs as well as reclaimable and non-reclaimable
> lists, both of which will be introduced and used by SGX EPC cgroups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Tiny nits: Let's also allude to the fact that this doesn't do anything
with the new helpers or structures for now.
I also think it's probably a sane idea to mention that the core VM also
has parallel LRU lists for cgroups.
> +static inline struct sgx_epc_page *
> +sgx_epc_pop_reclaimable(struct sgx_epc_lru_lists *lrus)
> +{
> + return __sgx_epc_page_list_pop(&(lrus)->reclaimable);
> +}
Are those '(lrus)' parenthesis doing anything useful?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists