[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y4mYdhRPsgfUrNyt@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 22:17:26 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] panic: Add new taint flag for fault injection
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:18:09PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> They aren't. They need fixing. Thankfully they haven't made it
> upstream, and I most definitely do not want random users mis-using
> "error injection" to inject random bpf code for non-error cases.
Which seem to be what HID-BPF is all about. And if I see linux-next
reports correctly that actually got merged despite all the oustanding
objections.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists