lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bdfb93b6-76de-e047-abeb-b36f79ee8f23@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:30:31 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: qcom,pm8058-led: Convert to DT schema

On 02/12/2022 01:08, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Convert the Qualcomm PM8058 PMIC LED bindings to DT schema.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pm8058.txt  | 67 -------------------
>>  .../bindings/leds/qcom,pm8058-led.yaml        | 57 ++++++++++++++++
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.yaml  |  4 ++
>>  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pm8058.txt
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/qcom,pm8058-led.yaml
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> Or should I apply it?

There will be conflicts with:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221201202144.448694-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/

So both patches could go via same tree to avoid it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ