lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ac15de-3324-6d48-5199-587f01b565e0@collabora.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:04:56 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     vincent@...temli.org
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com, rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, frank-w@...lic-files.de,
        daniel@...rotopia.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: Raise proc and sram max voltage for
 MT7622/7623

Il 02/12/22 10:52, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> During the addition of SRAM voltage tracking for CCI scaling, this
> driver got some voltage limits set for the vtrack algorithm: these
> were moved to platform data first, then enforced in a later commit
> 6a17b3876bc8 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()")
> using these as max values for the regulator_set_voltage() calls.
> 
> In this case, the vsram/vproc constraints for MT7622 and MT7623
> were supposed to be the same as MT2701 (and a number of other SoCs),
> but that turned out to be a mistake because the aforementioned two
> SoCs' maximum voltage for both VPROC and VPROC_SRAM is 1.36V.
> 
> Fix that by adding new platform data for MT7622/7623 declaring the
> right {proc,sram}_max_volt parameter.
> 
> Fixes: ead858bd128d ("cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data")
> Fixes: 6a17b3876bc8 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Hello Vincent,
in regard to the regression that you've (not so) recently reported, can you please
give this commit a try and check if this helps resolving your issue?

Many thanks,
Angelo

> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index 7f2680bc9a0f..f9a9f08c75c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -695,6 +695,15 @@ static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt2701_platform_data = {
>   	.ccifreq_supported = false,
>   };
>   
> +static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt7622_platform_data = {
> +	.min_volt_shift = 100000,
> +	.max_volt_shift = 200000,
> +	.proc_max_volt = 1360000,
> +	.sram_min_volt = 0,
> +	.sram_max_volt = 1360000,
> +	.ccifreq_supported = false,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt8183_platform_data = {
>   	.min_volt_shift = 100000,
>   	.max_volt_shift = 200000,
> @@ -717,8 +726,8 @@ static const struct mtk_cpufreq_platform_data mt8186_platform_data = {
>   static const struct of_device_id mtk_cpufreq_machines[] __initconst = {
>   	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
>   	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
> -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
> -	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622", .data = &mt7622_platform_data },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623", .data = &mt7622_platform_data },
>   	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
>   	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt817x", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },
>   	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173", .data = &mt2701_platform_data },

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ