linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Fix CONFIG_USB=y && CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y4nzorzdLh2Jnj3f@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:46:26 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Allen Webb <allenwebb@...gle.com>
Cc:     "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Fix CONFIG_USB=y && CONFIG_MODULES not set

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:16:29PM -0600, Allen Webb wrote:
> # Patch Review Discussion
> 
> Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> would prefer something generic and
> mentioned kmod already has builtin.alias.bin.

Wait, how can 0/1 have a patch in it?

Take some time and read the mailing list for hundreds of examples of how
people submit patch series and how they document the changes in them and
why they should be accepted.  I think you are making this much harder
than it has to be.

even more confused,

greg k-h