[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WBNpeWK31dCgzX5QAuR7AySkp_dEyY8WK3o8+SaiPxOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:36:54 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: align TLMM pin
configuration with DT schema
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:15 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> >> qup_uart6_4pin: qup-uart6-4pin-state {
> >> -
> >> - cts-pins {
> >> + qup_uart6_4pin_cts: cts-pins {
> >> pins = "gpio45";
> >> function = "qup6";
> >> - bias-pull-down;
> >
> > After your patch, where is the above bias set for cheza, db845c,
> > oneplus, shift-axolotl, ...?
> >
> >
> >> };
> >>
> >> - rts-tx-pins {
> >> + qup_uart6_4pin_rts_tx: rts-tx-pins {
> >> pins = "gpio46", "gpio47";
> >> function = "qup6";
> >> - drive-strength = <2>;
> >> - bias-disable;
> >
> > After your patch, where is the above bias / drive-strength set?
>
> They don't use 4-pin setup. If they use, I would assume they will
> override the entries just like sdm850 boards (where I override it to set
> these).
>
> Alternatively I can keep it in DTSI, but it is not really property of
> the SoC.
I see things like:
.../sdm845-cheza.dtsi: pinctrl-0 = <&qup_uart6_4pin>;
...before your patch that would get the bias/drive strength from the
SoC dtsi, right? After your patch, you've removed it from the dtsi but
not added it to the board. ...so I think it's a net change. Did I mess
up / miss something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists