linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix compiling when CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc2XtcbZPh5pic_uYiOuie0+5KdMO2hJav2HYGc_3ygfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:48:34 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Nick Hainke <vincent@...temli.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix compiling when CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV_V1 is not defined

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:30 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:04:54PM +0100, Nick Hainke wrote:
>
> Thank you for the report!
>
> I believe Bart needs to fold it into his patch / PR, because
> it's not good to send a broken PR to Linus.
>

Ah cr*p, I saw today's next build went fine, so I assumed the patch
was good to go and sent the PR.

Yeah, if Nick is fine with that, I'd like to squash it with the
offending commit or we'll break bisectability.

Thanks for the report.

Bartosz