[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167007547263.4906.10472927215347122978.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:51:12 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode
revision and processor flags
The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5b1586ab064ca24c6a7a6be7a9d0cb9e237ef39a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5b1586ab064ca24c6a7a6be7a9d0cb9e237ef39a
Author: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:26 -08:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 14:41:06 +01:00
x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode revision and processor flags
collect_cpu_info() is used to collect the current microcode revision and
processor flags on every CPU.
It had a weird mechanism to try to mimick a "once" functionality in the
sense that, that information should be issued only when it is differing
from the previous CPU.
However (1):
the new calling sequence started doing that in parallel:
microcode_init()
|-> schedule_on_each_cpu(setup_online_cpu)
|-> collect_cpu_info()
resulting in multiple redundant prints:
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
However (2):
dumping this here is not that important because the kernel does not
support mixed silicon steppings microcode. Finally!
Besides, there is already a pr_info() in microcode_reload_late() that
shows both the old and new revisions.
What is more, the CPU signature (sig=0x50654) and Processor Flags
(pf=0x80) above aren't that useful to the end user, they are available
via /proc/cpuinfo and they don't change anyway.
Remove the redundant pr_info().
[ bp: Heavily massage. ]
Fixes: b6f86689d5b7 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk")
Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103175901.164783-2-ashok.raj@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index c4a00fb..4f93875 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -554,7 +554,6 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
- static struct cpu_signature prev;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
unsigned int val[2];
@@ -570,13 +569,6 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
csig->rev = c->microcode;
- /* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
- if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf || csig->rev != prev.rev) {
- pr_info("sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
- csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
- prev = *csig;
- }
-
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists