linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/uclamp: Fix a uninitialized variable warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221203143234.fbbdjoc6istwxkee@airbuntu>
Date:   Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:32:34 +0000
From:   Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
        Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>,
        Hank <han.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Jonathan JMChen <Jonathan.JMChen@...iatek.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/uclamp: Fix a uninitialized variable warnings

On 12/01/22 23:38, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 27/11/2022 15:17, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Addresses the following warnings:
> > 
> >> config: riscv-randconfig-m031-20221111
> >> compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> >>
> >> smatch warnings:
> >> kernel/sched/fair.c:7263 find_energy_efficient_cpu() error: uninitialized symbol 'util_min'.
> >> kernel/sched/fair.c:7263 find_energy_efficient_cpu() error: uninitialized symbol 'util_max'.
> > 
> > Fixes: 244226035a1f ("sched/uclamp: Fix fits_capacity() check in feec()")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@...alina.io>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++-----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 4cc56c91e06e..89dadaafc1ec 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -7217,10 +7217,10 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> >  	eenv_task_busy_time(&eenv, p, prev_cpu);
> >  
> >  	for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
> > +		unsigned long util_min = p_util_min, util_max = p_util_max;
> >  		unsigned long cpu_cap, cpu_thermal_cap, util;
> >  		unsigned long cur_delta, max_spare_cap = 0;
> >  		unsigned long rq_util_min, rq_util_max;
> > -		unsigned long util_min, util_max;
> >  		unsigned long prev_spare_cap = 0;
> >  		int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
> >  		unsigned long base_energy;
> > @@ -7258,10 +7258,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
> >  			 * aligned with sched_cpu_util().
> >  			 */
> >  			if (uclamp_is_used()) {
> > -				if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> > -					util_min = p_util_min;
> > -					util_max = p_util_max;
> > -				} else {
> > +				if (!uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> >  					/*
> >  					 * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> >  					 * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
> 
> Can we use `struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu)` to reduce nesting and comply
> with 80 columns line length?

Yep, that's better!


Thanks!

--
Qais Yousef

> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 89dadaafc1ec..6a2fc2ca5078 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7239,6 +7239,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>  		eenv.pd_cap = 0;
>  
>  		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
> +			struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
>  			eenv.pd_cap += cpu_thermal_cap;
>  
>  			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
> @@ -7257,21 +7259,19 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
>  			 * much capacity we can get out of the CPU; this is
>  			 * aligned with sched_cpu_util().
>  			 */
> -			if (uclamp_is_used()) {
> -				if (!uclamp_rq_is_idle(cpu_rq(cpu))) {
> -					/*
> -					 * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> -					 * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
> -					 * only. util_fits_cpu() logic requires to
> -					 * operate on non clamped util but must use the
> -					 * max-aggregated uclamp_{min, max}.
> -					 */
> -					rq_util_min = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MIN);
> -					rq_util_max = uclamp_rq_get(cpu_rq(cpu), UCLAMP_MAX);
> -
> -					util_min = max(rq_util_min, p_util_min);
> -					util_max = max(rq_util_max, p_util_max);
> -				}
> +			if (uclamp_is_used() && !uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq)) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for
> +				 * the clamp() part. Ie: apply max aggregation
> +				 * only. util_fits_cpu() logic requires to
> +				 * operate on non clamped util but must use the
> +				 * max-aggregated uclamp_{min, max}.
> +				 */
> +				rq_util_min = uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MIN);
> +				rq_util_max = uclamp_rq_get(rq, UCLAMP_MAX);
> +
> +				util_min = max(rq_util_min, p_util_min);
> +				util_max = max(rq_util_max, p_util_max);
>  			}
>  			if (!util_fits_cpu(util, util_min, util_max, cpu))
>  				continue;