lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:44:05 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     "stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...wei.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "j.alglave@....ac.uk" <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        "luc.maranget@...ia.fr" <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        "akiyks@...il.com" <akiyks@...il.com>,
        "dlustig@...dia.com" <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        "joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        "urezki@...il.com" <urezki@...il.com>,
        "quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        "frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: memory-model: Make plain accesses carry
 dependencies

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 03:34:20PM -0500, stern@...land.harvard.edu wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 11:58:36AM +0000, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Boqun Feng [mailto:boqun.feng@...il.com] 
> > > Sent: Friday, December 2, 2022 7:50 PM
> > 
> > > > I wonder is this patch a first step to solve the OOTA problem you reported in OSS:
> > > >	https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/osseu2022/e1/oss-eu22-jonas.pdf
> > > > If so maybe it's better to put the link in the commit log I think.
> > > 
> > > It's not directly related to that specific problem, it does solve some other OOTA issues though.
> > > If you think we should link to the talk, there's also a video with slightly more updated slides from the actual talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDKhIxKhoQ
> > > do you think I should link to both then?
> > 
> > It is not hard for me to add that in if people believe that it should be
> > included.  But default is lazy in this case.  ;-)
> 
> I don't think there's any need to mention that video in the commit log.  
> It's an introductory talk, and it's pretty safe to assume that anyone 
> reading the commit because they are interested in the LKMM in great 
> detail is already beyond the introductory level.
> 
> On the other hand, it wouldn't hurt to include a Link: tag to an 
> appropriate message in this email thread.  (I leave it up to Paul to 
> decide which message is most "appropriate" -- there may not be a good 
> candidate, because a lot of the messages were not CC'ed to LKML.)

For this approach, I would add this:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4262e55407294a5989e766bc4dc48293@huawei.com/

I could of course do both the extra paragraph -and- the Link:.  ;-)

Thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ