[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221203001439.64284671@slackpad.lan>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:14:57 +0000
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: sunxi-ng: Remove duplicate ARCH_SUNXI
dependencies
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 13:13:15 -0600
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org> wrote:
Hi,
thanks for addressing this!
> SUNXI_CCU already depends on ARCH_SUNXI, so adding the dependency to
> individual SoC drivers is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig
> index 461537679c04..64cfa022e320 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig
> @@ -14,43 +14,43 @@ config SUNIV_F1C100S_CCU
>
> config SUN20I_D1_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner D1 CCU"
> - default RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default RISCV
> + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
I agree on the "depends" part: Indeed the guard symbol already covers
that, so it's redundant.
However I am not so sure about the "default" part: When ARCH_SUNXI is
deselected, but COMPILE_TEST in enabled, we default to every CCU driver
being built-in. I am not sure this is the intention, or at least
expected when doing compile testing?
>
> config SUN20I_D1_R_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner D1 PRCM CCU"
> - default RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (RISCV && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default RISCV
> + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN50I_A64_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner A64 CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
I wonder if this "depends" line was always wrong and should be fixed:
We can compile a 32-bit ARM kernel and run it on an A64. Granted this
requires a special bootloader or a hacked U-Boot (tried that), and
reveals some other issues with the decompressor, but technically there
is no 64-bit dependency in here.
The same goes for all the other ARM64 CCUs: Cortex-A53s can run AArch32
in all exception levels.
So shall we just completely remove the "depends" line for those, and
let SUNXI_CCU do that job? Or use use !RISCV || COMPILE_TEST?
Cheers,
Andre
>
> config SUN50I_A100_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner A100 CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN50I_A100_R_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner A100 PRCM CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN50I_H6_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner H6 CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN50I_H616_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner H616 CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN50I_H6_R_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner H6 and H616 PRCM CCU"
> - default ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default ARM64
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN4I_A10_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner A10/A20 CCU"
> @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ config SUN6I_A31_CCU
>
> config SUN6I_RTC_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner H616/R329 RTC CCU"
> - default ARCH_SUNXI
> - depends on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST
> + default y
>
> config SUN8I_A23_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner A23 CCU"
> @@ -91,8 +90,8 @@ config SUN8I_A83T_CCU
>
> config SUN8I_H3_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner H3 CCU"
> - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI)
> - depends on MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
> + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64
> + depends on MACH_SUN8I || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
>
> config SUN8I_V3S_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner V3s CCU"
> @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ config SUN8I_V3S_CCU
>
> config SUN8I_DE2_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner SoCs DE2 CCU"
> - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI)
> + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64
>
> config SUN8I_R40_CCU
> tristate "Support for the Allwinner R40 CCU"
> @@ -115,6 +114,6 @@ config SUN9I_A80_CCU
>
> config SUN8I_R_CCU
> tristate "Support for Allwinner SoCs' PRCM CCUs"
> - default MACH_SUN8I || (ARCH_SUNXI && ARM64)
> + default MACH_SUN8I || ARM64
>
> endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists