linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] [mm-unstable] mm: Fix memcg reclaim on memory tiered systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHS8izNFF+kYihrRru=w5P+bBYHJfJVNYf=6LZ3RtSNcMcuLzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Dec 2022 02:35:12 -0800
From:   Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, weixugc@...gle.com,
        fvdl@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [mm-unstable] mm: Fix memcg reclaim on memory tiered systems

On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 2:32 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mina,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
>
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mina-Almasry/mm-Fix-memcg-reclaim-on-memory-tiered-systems/20221204-173146
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221204093008.2620459-1-almasrymina%40google.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2] [mm-unstable] mm: Fix memcg reclaim on memory tiered systems
> config: alpha-buildonly-randconfig-r005-20221204
> compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/332f41fcb1b1d6bc7dafd40e8c1e10a1a0952849
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mina-Almasry/mm-Fix-memcg-reclaim-on-memory-tiered-systems/20221204-173146
>         git checkout 332f41fcb1b1d6bc7dafd40e8c1e10a1a0952849
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=alpha SHELL=/bin/bash
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    mm/vmscan.c: In function 'demote_folio_list':
> >> mm/vmscan.c:1618:9: error: too many arguments to function 'node_get_allowed_targets'
>     1618 |         node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask, demote_from_nodemask);
>          |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from mm/vmscan.c:46:
>    include/linux/memory-tiers.h:94:20: note: declared here
>       94 | static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
>          |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

I missed updating this function signature. Will fix it in v3.

>
> vim +/node_get_allowed_targets +1618 mm/vmscan.c
>
>   1587
>   1588  /*
>   1589   * Take folios on @demote_folios and attempt to demote them to another node.
>   1590   * Folios which are not demoted are left on @demote_folios.
>   1591   */
>   1592  static unsigned int demote_folio_list(struct list_head *demote_folios,
>   1593                                        struct pglist_data *pgdat,
>   1594                                        nodemask_t *demote_from_nodemask)
>   1595  {
>   1596          int target_nid = next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id);
>   1597          unsigned int nr_succeeded;
>   1598          nodemask_t allowed_mask;
>   1599
>   1600          struct migration_target_control mtc = {
>   1601                  /*
>   1602                   * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly.
>   1603                   * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded
>   1604                   * instead of migrated.
>   1605                   */
>   1606                  .gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) | __GFP_NOWARN |
>   1607                          __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
>   1608                  .nid = target_nid,
>   1609                  .nmask = &allowed_mask
>   1610          };
>   1611
>   1612          if (list_empty(demote_folios))
>   1613                  return 0;
>   1614
>   1615          if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>   1616                  return 0;
>   1617
> > 1618          node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask, demote_from_nodemask);
>   1619
>   1620          /* Demotion ignores all cpuset and mempolicy settings */
>   1621          migrate_pages(demote_folios, alloc_demote_page, NULL,
>   1622                        (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION,
>   1623                        &nr_succeeded);
>   1624
>   1625          __count_vm_events(PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(), nr_succeeded);
>   1626
>   1627          return nr_succeeded;
>   1628  }
>   1629
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://01.org/lkp