[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221204174632.3677-3-jszhang@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 01:46:21 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/13] riscv: move riscv_noncoherent_supported() out of ZICBOM probe
It's a bit weird to call riscv_noncoherent_supported() each time when
insmoding a module. Move the calling out of feature patch func.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index c743f0adc794..364d1fe86bea 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -274,7 +274,6 @@ static bool __init_or_module cpufeature_probe_zicbom(unsigned int stage)
if (!riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM))
return false;
- riscv_noncoherent_supported();
return true;
}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 86acd690d529..6eea40bf8c6b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
riscv_fill_hwcap();
apply_boot_alternatives();
+ if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, ZICBOM))
+ riscv_noncoherent_supported();
}
static int __init topology_init(void)
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists