linux-kernel - [PATCH] ACPI: thermal: Adjust critical.flags.valid check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5883789.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher>
Date:   Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:56:14 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: thermal: Adjust critical.flags.valid check

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

It is not necessary to compare critical.flags.valid to 1 in
acpi_thermal_trips_update() and doing so is also inconsistent with
other similar checks in that code, so simply check if the flag is
not 0 instead.

No expected functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/thermal.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_trips_update(str
 					  "Found critical threshold [%lu]\n",
 					  tz->trips.critical.temperature);
 		}
-		if (tz->trips.critical.flags.valid == 1) {
+		if (tz->trips.critical.flags.valid) {
 			if (crt == -1) {
 				tz->trips.critical.flags.valid = 0;
 			} else if (crt > 0) {