linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/5] ACPI: processor: perflib: Adjust white space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13154277.uLZWGnKmhe@kreacher>
Date:   Mon, 05 Dec 2022 20:03:30 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] ACPI: processor: perflib: Adjust white space

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Some inconsistent usage of white space in the ACPI processor performance
library code causes that code to be somewhat harder to read that it
would have been otherwise, so adjust the white space in there to
address that.

No expected functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cp
 	pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
 	if (!pr || !pr->performance || !pr->performance->state_count)
 		return -ENODEV;
+
 	*limit = pr->performance->states[pr->performance_platform_limit].
 		core_frequency * 1000;
 	return 0;
@@ -201,8 +202,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
 	}
 
 	pct = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
-	if (!pct || (pct->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
-	    || (pct->package.count != 2)) {
+	if (!pct || (pct->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) || (pct->package.count != 2)) {
 		pr_err("Invalid _PCT data\n");
 		result = -EFAULT;
 		goto end;
@@ -214,9 +214,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
 
 	obj = pct->package.elements[0];
 
-	if ((obj.type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
-	    || (obj.buffer.length < sizeof(struct acpi_pct_register))
-	    || (obj.buffer.pointer == NULL)) {
+	if ((obj.type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) ||
+	    (obj.buffer.length < sizeof(struct acpi_pct_register)) ||
+	    (obj.buffer.pointer == NULL)) {
 		pr_err("Invalid _PCT data (control_register)\n");
 		result = -EFAULT;
 		goto end;
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
 
 	obj = pct->package.elements[1];
 
-	if ((obj.type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
-	    || (obj.buffer.length < sizeof(struct acpi_pct_register))
-	    || (obj.buffer.pointer == NULL)) {
+	if ((obj.type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) ||
+	    (obj.buffer.length < sizeof(struct acpi_pct_register)) ||
+	    (obj.buffer.pointer == NULL)) {
 		pr_err("Invalid _PCT data (status_register)\n");
 		result = -EFAULT;
 		goto end;
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct a
 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD)
 		return;
 
-	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10)
-	    || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
+	if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10) ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) {
 		rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi);
 		/*
 		 * MSR C001_0064+:
@@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
 		 * Check that ACPI's u64 MHz will be valid as u32 KHz in cpufreq
 		 */
 		if (!px->core_frequency ||
-		    ((u32)(px->core_frequency * 1000) !=
-		     (px->core_frequency * 1000))) {
+		    ((u32)(px->core_frequency * 1000) != (px->core_frequency * 1000))) {
 			pr_err(FW_BUG
 			       "Invalid BIOS _PSS frequency found for processor %d: 0x%llx MHz\n",
 			       pr->id, px->core_frequency);
@@ -499,7 +498,6 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct mod
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_notify_smm);
 
 int acpi_processor_get_psd(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_psd_package *pdomain)
@@ -532,8 +530,7 @@ int acpi_processor_get_psd(acpi_handle h
 	state.length = sizeof(struct acpi_psd_package);
 	state.pointer = pdomain;
 
-	status = acpi_extract_package(&(psd->package.elements[0]),
-		&format, &state);
+	status = acpi_extract_package(&(psd->package.elements[0]), &format, &state);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		pr_err("Invalid _PSD data\n");
 		result = -EFAULT;
@@ -716,9 +713,8 @@ err_out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_preregister_performance);
 
-int
-acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
-				    *performance, unsigned int cpu)
+int acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
+					*performance, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct acpi_processor *pr;
 
@@ -751,7 +747,6 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(stru
 	mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
 	return 0;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_register_performance);
 
 void acpi_processor_unregister_performance(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -768,11 +763,11 @@ void acpi_processor_unregister_performan
 
 	if (pr->performance)
 		kfree(pr->performance->states);
+
 	pr->performance = NULL;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
 
 	return;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_unregister_performance);