linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221205043044.bgecubnw7d3xlyi5@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:00:44 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        regressions@...mhuis.info, daniel@...rotopia.org,
        thomas.huehn@...nordhausen.de, "v5 . 19+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick <vincent@...temli.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: mediatek: Refine
 mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()"

On 02-12-22, 20:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 1:17 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:26 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit 6a17b3876bc8303612d7ad59ecf7cbc0db418bcd.
> > >
> > > This commit caused regression on Banana Pi R64 (MT7622), revert until
> > > the problem is identified and fixed properly.
> > >
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/930778a1-5e8b-6df6-3276-42dcdadaf682@systemli.org/
> > > Cc: v5.19+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.19+
> > > Reported-by: Nick <vincent@...temli.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> >
> > Do you want me to push this revert for -rc8?

No, I was planning to make it part of my pull request.

> After all, I've decided to queue it up for 6.2, thanks!

Can you please drop that ? AngeloGioacchino already reported that
Reverting the proposed commit will make MT8183 unstable.

So the right thing to do now is apply the fix, which is on the list
and getting tested.

-- 
viresh