linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: add cond_resched() in swapin_walk_pmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221205130359.2c81c5df0fb777cf55495a02@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:03:59 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <xialonglong1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add cond_resched() in swapin_walk_pmd_entry()

On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:03:27 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:

> When handle MADV_WILLNEED in madvise(), the soflockup may be occurred
> in swapin_walk_pmd_entry() if swapin lots of memory on slow device,
> add a cond_resched() into it to avoid the possible softlockup.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static int swapin_walk_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long start,
>  			put_page(page);
>  	}
>  	swap_read_unplug(splug);
> +	cond_resched();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

I wonder if this would be better in walk_pmd_range(), to address other
very large walk attempts.