[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221205220100.a2omqdmhtw26i7qx@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:01:00 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: ye.xingchen@....com.cn
Cc: agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] soc: qcom: smem_state: Use
device_match_of_node()
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:48:06PM +0800, ye.xingchen@....com.cn wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with device_match_of_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> index e848cc9a3cf8..a7844841a727 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem_state.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static struct qcom_smem_state *of_node_to_state(struct device_node *np)
> mutex_lock(&list_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(state, &smem_states, list) {
> - if (state->of_node == np) {
> + if (device_match_of_node(state, np)) {
I don't find this form easier to read, nor is state a struct device *...
Regards,
Bjorn
> kref_get(&state->refcount);
> goto unlock;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists