linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: mediatek: Refine mtk_cpufreq_voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 05:00:59 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        regressions@...mhuis.info, daniel@...rotopia.org,
        thomas.huehn@...nordhausen.de, "v5 . 19+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick <vincent@...temli.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: mediatek: Refine
 mtk_cpufreq_voltage_tracking()"

On 05-12-22, 13:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, this was a bit unclear.

Hmm, yeah. I assumed that the arm stuff will go via my tree and you
will be in sync with this. But yeah, a comment in the patch won't have
hurt.

> Alright then, I'll assume that the proper fix will come in through
> your pull request for 6.2 (but please send that one before the merge
> window opens), thanks!

I was ready with pull request since several days, was just waiting for
this to get sorted out. And I think this may get delayed a bit too, so
I better send the first pull request now and worry about this later.

-- 
viresh