lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 09:37:40 +0100
From:   Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc: qcom: add support for the I2C Master Hub

On 05/12/2022 09:31, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:49:21PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 03:47:00PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> The I2C Master Hub is a stripped down version of the GENI Serial Engine
>>> QUP Wrapper Controller but only supporting I2C serial engines without
>>> DMA support.
>>>
>>> The I2C Master Hub only supports a variant of the I2C serial engine with:
>>> - a separate "core" clock
>>> - no DMA support
>>> - non discoverable fixed FIFO size
>>>
>>> Since DMA isn't supported, the wrapper doesn't need the Master AHB clock
>>> and the iommus property neither.
>>>
>>> This patchset adds the bindings changes to the QUPv3 wrapper and I2C serial
>>> element bindings to reflect the different resources requirements.
>>>
>>> In order to reuse the QUPv3 wrapper and I2C serial element driver support,
>>> the I2C Master Hub requirements are expressed in new desc structs passed
>>> as device match data.
>>
>> Is everyone fine if I take all this via the I2C tree?
> 
> I did this now.
> 
> All applied to for-next, thanks!
> 

Thanks !

Neil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ