[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221205105143.j6m4g6uzkiy3j3y6@quack3>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:51:43 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Bartosz Taudul <wolf@...eid.pl>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: Increase UDF_MAX_READ_VERSION to 0x0260
On Sat 03-12-22 01:07:24, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> Some discs containing the UDF file system are unable to be mounted,
> failing with the following message:
>
> UDF-fs: error (device sr0): udf_fill_super: minUDFReadRev=260
> (max is 250)
>
> The UDF 2.60 specification [0] states in the section Basic Restrictions
> & Requirements (page 10):
>
> The Minimum UDF Read Revision value shall be at most #0250 for all
> media with a UDF 2.60 file system. This indicates that a UDF 2.50
> implementation can read all UDF 2.60 media. Media that do not have a
> Metadata Partition may use a value lower than #250.
>
> The conclusion is that the discs failing to mount were burned with a
> faulty software, which didn't follow the specification. This can be
> worked around by increasing UDF_MAX_READ_VERSION to 0x260, to match the
> Minimum Read Revision. No other changes are required, as reading UDF
> 2.60 is backward compatible with UDF 2.50.
>
> [0] http://www.osta.org/specs/pdf/udf260.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Taudul <wolf@...eid.pl>
Yeah, thanks for the patch. I've merged it into my tree.
Honza
> ---
> fs/udf/
> udf_sb.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/udf_sb.h b/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
> index 4fa620543d30..09d62bf1f5fb 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
> +++ b/fs/udf/udf_sb.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/magic.h>
>
> -#define UDF_MAX_READ_VERSION 0x0250
> +#define UDF_MAX_READ_VERSION 0x0260
> #define UDF_MAX_WRITE_VERSION 0x0201
>
> #define UDF_FLAG_USE_EXTENDED_FE 0
> --
> 2.38.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists