[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y43cUGf0qUOIXRgZ@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:56:00 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: fix USB-DP PHY nodes
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:12:13PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2022 09:50, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Update the USB4-USB3-DP QMP PHY nodes to match the new binding which
> > specifically includes the missing register regions (e.g. DP_PHY) and
> > allows for supporting DisplayPort Alternate Mode.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> > ---
> Johan (and anyone also interested in this),
>
> What are the next steps with this for older SoCs? Is there any plan to
> change the bindings and DTS for them in similar way?
Yeah, I think we should go ahead with that. Especially, as it seems
some of the older platforms were never tested and the DTs were
incorrect to begin with.
I'll take a look at doing so when reviewing the latest revision of the
sm6350 series (which is moving to the new scheme).
Just have a couple of higher prio tasks to get out the door first.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists