linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] gpiolib: don't allow user-space to crash the kernel with hot-unplugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y43vgFY+qnqH8+0P@sol>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:17:52 +0800
From:   Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Nick Hainke <vincent@...temli.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] gpiolib: don't allow user-space to crash the
 kernel with hot-unplugs

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:01:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > > 
> > > Linus Torvalds pointed out that using trylock here is wrong. This iteration
> > > drops it in favor of unconditional locks but keeps all the fixes that came
> > > later.
> > > 
> > > I will also not send it for this release but make it part of the updates PR
> > > for v6.2 to give it some time in next.
> > > 
> > > v7 -> v8:
> > > - don't use down_read_trylock(), just go straight for a full lock
> > 
> > Yep, it was a good wrap-up explanation.
> 
> But he also suggested to fold NULL check into call_*_locked(). Any points why
> you decided not to go that way?
> 

He also mentioned making it more back-portable.
Does that mean splitting out the patches for uAPI v1 and v2, if not for
each of the Fixes? Or does he mean back-porting it to 6.1?

Cheers,
Kent.