[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64f7f939-0c71-e5de-9812-fd46bfdd89a8@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 09:11:18 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: james.clark@....com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Reset remaining bits in
perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields()
On 12/1/22 11:21, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() resets all struct perf_branch_entry bit
> fields before capturing branch records. This resets remaining bit fields
> except 'new_type', which is valid only when 'type' is PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> This applies on v6.1-rc6
>
> 'perf_branch_entry.new_type' can remain uninitialized as explained earlier.
> Also there is no PERF_BR_NEW_UNKNOWN to spare, because 'perf_branch_entry.
> new_type' enumeration starts at PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN, to save a position
> for the extended branch types instead.
>
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 0031f7b4d9ab..c97b5f6f77a4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1110,8 +1110,9 @@ static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *b
> br->in_tx = 0;
> br->abort = 0;
> br->cycles = 0;
> - br->type = 0;
> + br->type = PERF_BR_UNKNOWN;
> br->spec = PERF_BR_SPEC_NA;
> + br->priv = PERF_BR_PRIV_UNKNOWN;
> br->reserved = 0;
> }
>
Hello Peter,
Just wondering is there a chance that this patch could make it to v6.2-rc1 ?
- Anshuman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists