[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221206200740.3567551-18-michael@walle.cc>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 21:07:36 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 17/21] nvmem: core: provide own priv pointer in post process callback
It doesn't make any more sense to have a opaque pointer set up by the
nvmem device. Usually, the layout isn't associated with a particular
nvmem device. Instead, let the caller who set the post process callback
provide the priv pointer.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
---
changes since v4:
- none
changes since v3:
- none
changes since v2:
- don't drop the pointer but let the user specify an opaque pointer
changes since v1:
- new patch
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 4 +++-
include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index dc329daaa350..2282dc80aa0b 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_entry {
int bit_offset;
int nbits;
nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
+ void *priv;
struct device_node *np;
struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
struct list_head node;
@@ -470,6 +471,7 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_entry_nodup(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
cell->bytes = info->bytes;
cell->name = info->name;
cell->read_post_process = info->read_post_process;
+ cell->priv = info->priv;
cell->bit_offset = info->bit_offset;
cell->nbits = info->nbits;
@@ -1554,7 +1556,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
if (cell->read_post_process) {
- rc = cell->read_post_process(nvmem->priv, id, index,
+ rc = cell->read_post_process(cell->priv, id, index,
cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
if (rc)
return rc;
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index 12833fe4eb4d..cb0814f2ddae 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ typedef int (*nvmem_reg_write_t)(void *priv, unsigned int offset,
void *val, size_t bytes);
/* used for vendor specific post processing of cell data */
typedef int (*nvmem_cell_post_process_t)(void *priv, const char *id, int index,
- unsigned int offset, void *buf, size_t bytes);
+ unsigned int offset, void *buf,
+ size_t bytes);
enum nvmem_type {
NVMEM_TYPE_UNKNOWN = 0,
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct nvmem_keepout {
* @np: Optional device_node pointer.
* @read_post_process: Callback for optional post processing of cell data
* on reads.
+ * @priv: Opaque data passed to the read_post_process hook.
*/
struct nvmem_cell_info {
const char *name;
@@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell_info {
unsigned int nbits;
struct device_node *np;
nvmem_cell_post_process_t read_post_process;
+ void *priv;
};
/**
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists