linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] riscv: module: move find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:44:23 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] riscv: module: move find_section to module.h

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 01:46:27AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Move it to the header so that the implementation can be shared
> by the alternatives code.

I'm not a super big fan of these perfunctory commit messages.
Maybe I'm being a bit ornery, but a few words about why the alternatives
could benefit from this would be nice. Also, s/it/find_section()/ please.

How about:
> Move find_section() to module.h so that the implementation can be shared
> by the alternatives code. This will allow us to use alternatives in
> the vdso.


> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/module.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/module.c      | 15 ---------------

Silly question maybe, but is module.h the right place to put this?
But I have nothing better to suggest, and I hate bikeshedding stuff when
I have no suggestion to make.

Rationale behind the movement seems grand to me though, so I suppose:
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.

>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/module.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/module.h
> index 76aa96a9fc08..78722a79fc59 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/module.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/module.h
> @@ -111,4 +111,19 @@ static inline struct plt_entry *get_plt_entry(unsigned long val,
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MODULE_SECTIONS */
>  
> +static inline const Elf_Shdr *find_section(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
> +					   const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> +					   const char *name)
> +{
> +	const Elf_Shdr *s, *se;
> +	const char *secstrs = (void *)hdr + sechdrs[hdr->e_shstrndx].sh_offset;
> +
> +	for (s = sechdrs, se = sechdrs + hdr->e_shnum; s < se; s++) {
> +		if (strcmp(name, secstrs + s->sh_name) == 0)
> +			return s;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MODULE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> index 91fe16bfaa07..76f4b9c2ec5b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> @@ -429,21 +429,6 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -static const Elf_Shdr *find_section(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
> -				    const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
> -				    const char *name)
> -{
> -	const Elf_Shdr *s, *se;
> -	const char *secstrs = (void *)hdr + sechdrs[hdr->e_shstrndx].sh_offset;
> -
> -	for (s = sechdrs, se = sechdrs + hdr->e_shnum; s < se; s++) {
> -		if (strcmp(name, secstrs + s->sh_name) == 0)
> -			return s;
> -	}
> -
> -	return NULL;
> -}
> -
>  int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
>  		    const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
>  		    struct module *me)
> -- 
> 2.37.2
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)