[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3e40bfd9-2345-45ea-af1c-b8000b50ac01@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 22:04:31 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Dario Binacchi" <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Amarula patchwork" <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@...il.com>,
"Martin Kaiser" <martin@...ser.cx>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@....com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: imx: add missing of_node_put()
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022, at 18:10, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> The 5 patches in the series fix the same problem on different platforms.
> In doing so it is possible to add to each of them the tag "Fixes" which
> identifies the commit they fix.
I think these should be combined into a single patch after all.
It's not a problem to have multiple 'Fixes' tags pointing to
different commits here, as the patches would not get backported
to a different set of kernels.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists