linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the vfio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221206162321.33b41f1d.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:23:21 -0700
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the vfio tree

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:55:42 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/vfio/Kconfig
>   drivers/vfio/Makefile
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   20601c45a0fa ("vfio: Remove CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH")
>   e2d55709398e ("vfio: Fold vfio_virqfd.ko into vfio.ko")
> 
> from the vfio tree and commits:
> 
>   a4d1f91db502 ("vfio-iommufd: Support iommufd for physical VFIO devices")
>   e5a9ec7e096a ("vfio: Make vfio_container optionally compiled")
>   c2849d718d26 ("vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c")
> 
> from the iommufd tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Looks good, thank you,

Alex