[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221206043237.12159-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 10:02:35 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: <acme@...nel.org>
CC: <ravi.bangoria@....com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
<irogers@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<carsten.haitzler@....com>, <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
<maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
<atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <ananth.narayan@....com>,
<santosh.shukla@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf test: Add event group test
Multiple events in a group can belong to one or more pmus, however
there are some limitations to it. One of the limitation is, perf
doesn't allow creating a group of events from different hw pmus.
Write a simple test to create various combinations of hw, sw and
uncore pmu events and verify group creation succeeds or fails as
expected.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129111946.409-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
v2->v3:
- Define a set of uncore pmus that supports more than 3 events. This
will prevent false negative results by not picking random uncore
pmu. Test will be skipped if no uncore pmu found.
Ravi Bangoria (2):
perf tool: Move pmus list variable to new a file
perf test: Add event group test
tools/perf/tests/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 1 +
tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 5 ++
tools/perf/util/pmus.h | 9 +++
8 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/event_groups.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/pmus.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/pmus.h
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists