[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB4771E12DCF6D65E568627489E21B9@CO1PR11MB4771.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:32:31 +0000
From: <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <Madhuri.Sripada@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/2] net: phy: micrel: Fixed error related to
uninitialized symbol ret
Hi Andrew,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 7:07 PM
> To: Divya Koppera - I30481 <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
> Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com; linux@...linux.org.uk; davem@...emloft.net;
> edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> richardcochran@...il.com; UNGLinuxDriver
> <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>; Madhuri Sripada - I34878
> <Madhuri.Sripada@...rochip.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/2] net: phy: micrel: Fixed error related to
> uninitialized symbol ret
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 04:05:49PM +0530, Divya Koppera wrote:
> > Initialized return variable
> >
> > Fixes Old smatch warnings:
> > drivers/net/phy/micrel.c:1750 ksz886x_cable_test_get_status() error:
> > uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
>
> I guess this patch has been rebased without the smatch warning being
> changed because line 1750 in net-next/main is a blank line between two
> functions.
>
Yes, rebased without fix.
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > Fixes: 21b688dabecb ("net: phy: micrel: Cable Diag feature for lan8814
> > phy")
> > Signed-off-by: Divya Koppera <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
>
> So once i looked in the correct place:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists