linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuidle-haltpoll: Disable kvm guest polling when mwait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gG93BXZWOcRVpng_EN-h4+sOyUqTc1XRt4xZkqMnaZZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:59:02 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     lirongqing@...du.com
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        jpoimboe@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle-haltpoll: Disable kvm guest polling when
 mwait_idle is used

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 7:43 AM <lirongqing@...du.com> wrote:
>
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>

First off, can you please write the changelog as proper text in
English using capital letters and periods where applicable?  It is
hard to read the way it is.

> when KVM guest has mwait and mwait_idle is used as default idle function,
> Loading cpuidle-haltpoll will make idle function back to default_idle which
> is using HLT,

Which is because the ->enter callback pointer of state 1 in the
haltpoll driver points to default_enter_idle() which in turn invokes
default_idle() directly, right?

> As the commit aebef63cf7ff ("x86: Remove vendor checks from
> prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt") explains that mwait is preferred
>
> so disable kvm guest polling in this conditions to improve performance,
> like sockperf localhost test shows that latency is reduced by about 20%
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h   | 2 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c          | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c | 4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> index 67c9d73..159ef33 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -862,4 +862,6 @@ bool arch_is_platform_page(u64 paddr);
>  #define arch_is_platform_page arch_is_platform_page
>  #endif
>
> +bool is_mwait_idle(void);
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index c21b734..330972c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -896,6 +896,12 @@ void select_idle_routine(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>                 x86_idle = default_idle;
>  }
>
> +bool is_mwait_idle(void)
> +{
> +       return x86_idle == mwait_idle;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_mwait_idle);
> +
>  void amd_e400_c1e_apic_setup(void)
>  {
>         if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_AMD_APIC_C1E)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> index 3a39a7f..8cf1ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-haltpoll.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched/idle.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>  #include <linux/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
> +#include <linux/processor.h>
>
>  static bool force __read_mostly;
>  module_param(force, bool, 0444);
> @@ -111,6 +112,9 @@ static int __init haltpoll_init(void)
>         if (!kvm_para_available() || !haltpoll_want())
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> +       if (is_mwait_idle())
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +

So perhaps you could make default_enter_idle() be a bit more careful
about what it calls as the "default idle" routine?

>         cpuidle_poll_state_init(drv);
>
>         ret = cpuidle_register_driver(drv);
> --

Anyway, this is unlikely to get into 6.2, so please defer it until
6.2-rc1 is out.