| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221206120224.GC1216605@chaop.bj.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:02:24 +0800
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
luto@...nel.org, jun.nakajima@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, tabba@...gle.com,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, mhocko@...e.com,
wei.w.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] KVM: Update lpage info when private/shared
memory are mixed
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 02:49:59PM -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:13:45PM +0800,
> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
> > page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
> > backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
> > private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
> > is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
> > or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.
> >
> > Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
> > disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
> > to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
> > this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
> > private and shared.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 19 +++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 ++-
> > 5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
> >
> > #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> >
> > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> >
> > @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > #endif
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> > + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> > + */
> > +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED (1U << 31)
> > +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX ((1U << 31) - 1)
> > +
> > struct kvm_lpage_info {
> > int disallow_lpage;
> > };
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > {
> > struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> > int i;
> > + int disallow_count;
> >
> > for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> > linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> > +
> > + disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> > + WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> > + disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> > +
> > linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> > - WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> > }
> > +
> > +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> > +{
> > + return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + int level, bool mixed)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> > +
> > + if (mixed)
> > + linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > + else
> > + linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> > +{
> > + bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> > +
> > + if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> > + if (!expect_private)
> > + return false;
> > + } else if (expect_private)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > + gfn_t gfn = start;
> > + void *entry;
> > + bool mixed = false;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + entry = xas_load(&xas);
> > + while (gfn < end) {
> > + if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> > +
> > + if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> > + mixed = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + entry = xas_next(&xas);
> > + gfn++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + return mixed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + int level, unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long gfn;
> > +
> > + if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> > + return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> > +
> > + for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
> > + if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> > + !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> > + attrs))
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pages, mask;
> > + gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> > + int level;
> > + bool mixed;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> > + * lower level's scanning result.
> > + */
> > + for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> > + pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> > + mask = ~(pages - 1);
> > + first = start & mask;
> > + last = (end - 1) & mask;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> > + * we know they will not be mixed.
> > + */
> > + gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> > + gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > + mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > + linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > +
> > + if (first == last)
> > + return;
>
>
> continue.
Ya!
>
> > +
> > + for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> > + linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> > +
> > + gfn = last;
> > + gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
>
> if (gfn == gfn_end) continue.
Do you see a case where gfn can equal to gfn_end? Though it does not
hurt to add a check.
>
>
> > + mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > + linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > + if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > + kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(kvm, slot, attrs,
> > + start, end);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
> > if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
> > linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
> > ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > + ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> Is there any alignment restriction? If no, It should be +=.
> In practice, alignment will hold though.
All we need here is checking whether both userspace_addr and
restricted_offset are aligned to HPAGE_SIZE or not. '+=' actually can
yield wrong value in cases when userspace_addr + restricted_offset is
aligned to HPAGE_SIZE but individually they may not align to HPAGE_SIZE.
Thanks,
Chao
>
> Thanks,
>
> > /*
> > * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> > * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 3331c0c92838..25099c94e770 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
> > struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier;
> > };
> >
> > +static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > + return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > {
> > return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> > @@ -2316,4 +2321,18 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
> > /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
> > #define KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES 65536
> >
> > +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> > +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > + unsigned long attrs,
> > + gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif /* __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 4e1e1e113bf0..e107afea32f0 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> > + unsigned long attrs)
> > {
> > struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
> > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > @@ -2378,6 +2379,10 @@ static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > gfn_range.slot = slot;
> >
> > r |= kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &gfn_range);
> > +
> > + kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(kvm, slot, attrs,
> > + gfn_range.start,
> > + gfn_range.end);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2427,7 +2432,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> > KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
> > if (i > start)
> > - kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i);
> > + kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i, attrs->attributes);
> > kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
> > KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
> > srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> --
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists