[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1022b823-b0a7-0afa-bb88-954182e372cf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 23:07:07 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>, huyue2@...lpad.com,
syzbot+6f8cd9a0155b366d227f@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xiang@...nel.org, jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3] erofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block
address is zero
On 2022/12/5 14:08, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:49:57AM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
>> syzkaller reported a memleak:
>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=62f37ff612f0021641eda5b17f056f1668aa9aed
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xffff88811009c7f8 (size 136):
>> ...
>> backtrace:
>> [<ffffffff821db19b>] z_erofs_do_read_page+0x99b/0x1740
>> [<ffffffff821dee9e>] z_erofs_readahead+0x24e/0x580
>> [<ffffffff814bc0d6>] read_pages+0x86/0x3d0
>> ...
>>
>> syzkaller constructed a case: in z_erofs_register_pcluster(),
>> ztailpacking = false and map->m_pa = zero. This makes pcl->obj.index be
>> zero although pcl is not a inline pcluster.
>>
>> Then following path adds refcount for grp, but the refcount won't be put
>> because pcl is inline.
>>
>> z_erofs_readahead()
>> z_erofs_do_read_page() # for another page
>> z_erofs_collector_begin()
>> erofs_find_workgroup()
>> erofs_workgroup_get()
>>
>> Since it's illegal for the block address of a pcluster to be zero, add
>> check here to avoid registering the pcluster which would be leaked.
>>
>> Fixes: cecf864d3d76 ("erofs: support inline data decompression")
>> Reported-by: syzbot+6f8cd9a0155b366d227f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> As Gao's advice, we should fail to register pcluster if m_pa is zero.
>> Maked it this way and changed the commit message.
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> Slightly fix commit message and add -next tag.
>
> I've updated the patch itself as below
> (Since we only need to fail out for non-tailpacking cases, tailpacking
> inline inodes could still have m_pa < EROFS_BLKSIZ):
>
> From f5e037e760d338ca0c116e507be663cb843d42f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:49:57 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] erofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block address is zero
>
> syzkaller reported a memleak:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=62f37ff612f0021641eda5b17f056f1668aa9aed
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88811009c7f8 (size 136):
> ...
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff821db19b>] z_erofs_do_read_page+0x99b/0x1740
> [<ffffffff821dee9e>] z_erofs_readahead+0x24e/0x580
> [<ffffffff814bc0d6>] read_pages+0x86/0x3d0
> ...
>
> syzkaller constructed a case: in z_erofs_register_pcluster(),
> ztailpacking = false and map->m_pa = zero. This makes pcl->obj.index be
> zero although pcl is not a inline pcluster.
>
> Then following path adds refcount for grp, but the refcount won't be put
> because pcl is inline.
>
> z_erofs_readahead()
> z_erofs_do_read_page() # for another page
> z_erofs_collector_begin()
> erofs_find_workgroup()
> erofs_workgroup_get()
>
> Since it's illegal for the block address of a non-inlined pcluster to
> be zero, add check here to avoid registering the pcluster which would
> be leaked.
>
> Fixes: cecf864d3d76 ("erofs: support inline data decompression")
> Reported-by: syzbot+6f8cd9a0155b366d227f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists