| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAO4mrfcV_07hbj8NUuZrA8FH-kaRsrFy-2metecpTuE5kKHn5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 23:25:36 +0800
From: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@...il.com>
To: socketcan@...tkopp.net, mkl@...gutronix.de,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in can_rcv_filter
Dear Linux Developers,
Recently, when using our tool to fuzz kernel, the following crash was triggered.
HEAD commit: 147307c69ba
git tree: linux-next
compiler: clang 12.0.0
console output:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_c7TZ6WzCT-VLBimUP3xnkMpJPhjOAPY/view?usp=share_link
kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NAf4S43d9VOKD52xbrqw-PUP1Mbj8z-S/view?usp=share_link
Unfortunately, I didn't have a reproducer for this crash.
I'm wondering if there is a data race between can_receive and
sock_close, which leads to the invalid null value of dev and
dev_rcv_lists. I hope the following report is helpful.
IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: Wei Chen <harperchen1110@...il.com>
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000006020
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 132110067 P4D 132110067 PUD 1320b6067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 13844 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-next-20221118 #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-48-gd9c812dda519-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:can_rcv_filter+0x44/0x4e0 net/can/af_can.c:584
Code: 00 00 00 e8 3e 86 0f fd 49 8b 9e d8 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 af 81
0f fd 44 8b 23 48 8d bd 20 60 00 00 e8 a0 81 0f fd 48 89 2c 24 <8b> 9d
20 60 00 00 45 31 ed 31 ff 89 de e8 9a 1c fc fc 85 db 0f 84
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000003d50 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffff88813bc274d8 RBX: ffff8881310c5a10 RCX: ffffffff842b9940
RDX: 0000000000000522 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000006020
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000006023 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0001ffffffffffff R11: 00018881310c5a04 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff888106fb8880 R14: ffff8881308cba00 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fc9368b0700(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000006020 CR3: 0000000132249000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000020000180 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
can_receive+0x182/0x1f0 net/can/af_can.c:664
canfd_rcv+0x9a/0x120 net/can/af_can.c:703
__netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5482 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb+0x8b/0x1b0 net/core/dev.c:5596
process_backlog+0x23f/0x3b0 net/core/dev.c:5924
__napi_poll+0x65/0x420 net/core/dev.c:6485
napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6552 [inline]
net_rx_action+0x37e/0x730 net/core/dev.c:6663
__do_softirq+0xf2/0x2c9 kernel/softirq.c:571
do_softirq+0xb1/0xf0 kernel/softirq.c:472
</IRQ>
<TASK>
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x6f/0x80 kernel/softirq.c:396
local_bh_enable+0x1b/0x20 include/linux/bottom_half.h:33
netif_rx+0x63/0x1c0 net/core/dev.c:5003
can_send+0x521/0x5b0 net/can/af_can.c:286
bcm_can_tx+0x2f0/0x3f0 net/can/bcm.c:302
bcm_tx_setup net/can/bcm.c:1020 [inline]
bcm_sendmsg+0x1f78/0x2c50 net/can/bcm.c:1351
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x38f/0x500 net/socket.c:2476
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2530 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x197/0x230 net/socket.c:2559
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2568 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2566 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x42/0x50 net/socket.c:2566
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x4697f9
Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48
89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fc9368afc48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000077bf80 RCX: 00000000004697f9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000380 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00000000004d29e9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000077bf80
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000077bf80 R15: 00007ffe26483e60
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
CR2: 0000000000006020
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:can_rcv_filter+0x44/0x4e0 net/can/af_can.c:584
Code: 00 00 00 e8 3e 86 0f fd 49 8b 9e d8 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 af 81
0f fd 44 8b 23 48 8d bd 20 60 00 00 e8 a0 81 0f fd 48 89 2c 24 <8b> 9d
20 60 00 00 45 31 ed 31 ff 89 de e8 9a 1c fc fc 85 db 0f 84
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000003d50 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffff88813bc274d8 RBX: ffff8881310c5a10 RCX: ffffffff842b9940
RDX: 0000000000000522 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000006020
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000006023 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0001ffffffffffff R11: 00018881310c5a04 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff888106fb8880 R14: ffff8881308cba00 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fc9368b0700(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000006020 CR3: 0000000132249000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000020000180 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
2: 00 e8 add %ch,%al
4: 3e 86 0f xchg %cl,%ds:(%rdi)
7: fd std
8: 49 8b 9e d8 00 00 00 mov 0xd8(%r14),%rbx
f: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
12: e8 af 81 0f fd callq 0xfd0f81c6
17: 44 8b 23 mov (%rbx),%r12d
1a: 48 8d bd 20 60 00 00 lea 0x6020(%rbp),%rdi
21: e8 a0 81 0f fd callq 0xfd0f81c6
26: 48 89 2c 24 mov %rbp,(%rsp)
* 2a: 8b 9d 20 60 00 00 mov 0x6020(%rbp),%ebx <-- trapping instruction
30: 45 31 ed xor %r13d,%r13d
33: 31 ff xor %edi,%edi
35: 89 de mov %ebx,%esi
37: e8 9a 1c fc fc callq 0xfcfc1cd6
3c: 85 db test %ebx,%ebx
3e: 0f .byte 0xf
3f: 84 .byte 0x84
Best,
Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists