[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y49nxv41VMtqUSNk@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:03:18 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, irogers@...gle.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mark.rutland@....com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, carsten.haitzler@....com,
leo.yan@...aro.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tmricht@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@....com, ananth.narayan@....com,
santosh.shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf test: Add event group test
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 09:47:57AM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> On 2022-12-05 11:32 p.m., Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> > Multiple events in a group can belong to one or more pmus, however
> > there are some limitations to it. One of the limitation is, perf
> > doesn't allow creating a group of events from different hw pmus.
> > Write a simple test to create various combinations of hw, sw and
> > uncore pmu events and verify group creation succeeds or fails as
> > expected.
> >
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221129111946.409-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
> > v2->v3:
> > - Define a set of uncore pmus that supports more than 3 events. This
> > will prevent false negative results by not picking random uncore
> > pmu. Test will be skipped if no uncore pmu found.
> >
> > Ravi Bangoria (2):
> > perf tool: Move pmus list variable to new a file
>
> a new file
>
> Other than the above typo, the patch series looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Fixed that up, added your Acked-by, thanks.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists