linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y49p82Iac/+iYQ+1@spud>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:12:35 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:02:35PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> > > Higher Powers here, but some sort of logical ordering would probably be
> > > a good idea so as not to hold each other up?
> > > The non-string bit of your series has been fairly well reviewed & would,
> > > in theory, be mergeable once the tree re-opens? Timing aside, Jisheng's
> > > idea seems like a good one, no?
> 
> IMHO, it will be better if Palmer can merge Heiko's alternative improvements
> into riscv-next once well reviewed and the window is reopen. Then Drew,
> Prabhakar and I can rebase on that tree.

Unless I missed something, we're saying the same thing in different ways
:)


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)