[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DU0P192MB154719A31758750149418C73D61B9@DU0P192MB1547.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:35:57 +0800
From: Ji Rongfeng <SikoJobs@...look.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: martin.lau@...ux.dev, daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Upgrade bpf_{g,s}etsockopt return values
I have noticed that this patch has been marked as "Changes Requested"
for a few days, but there's no comment so far, which is abnormal and
confusing. I will resend this patch with updated documentation a few
days later. Please let me know if there're any suggestions. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists