[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61d98db6-68b3-1a5c-f59b-592048c742fd@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:26:54 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ftrace: fix syscall tracing on PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1
Le 07/12/2022 à 16:18, Mathieu Desnoyers a écrit :
> On 2022-12-06 21:09, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> writes:
>>> On 2022-12-05 17:50, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> IMHO the second option would be better because it does not increase the
>>> kernel image size as much as KALLSYMS_ALL.
>>
>> Yes I agree.
>>
>> Even if that did break something, any breakage would be limited to
>> arches which uses function descriptors, which are now all rare.
>
> Yes, it would only impact those arches using function descriptors, which
> are broken today with respect to system call tracing. Are you aware of
> other architectures other than PPC64 ELF ABI v1 supported by the Linux
> kernel that use function descriptors ?
$ git grep "select HAVE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS" arch/
arch/ia64/Kconfig: select HAVE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS
arch/parisc/Kconfig: select HAVE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS if 64BIT
arch/powerpc/Kconfig: select HAVE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS if
PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists