[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5EE7gm66eDNe9Us@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:26:06 -0500
From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
To: Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jack@...e.cz, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ext4: record error when detect abnormal
'i_reserved_data_blocks'
* Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
>
> If 'i_reserved_data_blocks' is not cleared which mean something wrong with
> code, free space accounting is likely wrong, according to Jan Kara's advice
> use ext4_error() to record this abnormal let fsck to repair and also we can
> capture this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 840e0a614959..41413338c05b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1387,10 +1387,10 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> }
>
> if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks)
> - ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR,
> - "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!",
> - inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
> - EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
> + ext4_error(inode->i_sb,
> + "Inode %lu (%p): i_reserved_data_blocks (%u) not cleared!",
> + inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
> + EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
It would be better if the arguments to ext4_error after the first were aligned
under "inode->i_sb", as you had in your first version. That's typical ext4
practice as seen earlier in this function, though this does pass checkpatch.
Otherwise, looks good.
That said, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
> }
>
> static void init_once(void *foo)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists