[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5BNCbFyvNA1Xp/X@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:21:29 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
eugene.loh@...cle.com, kris.van.hees@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/13] kbuild: remove
MODULE_LICENSE/AUTHOR/DESCRIPTION in non-modules
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 09:03:52PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> But I don't see the point in keeping things around just in case, if we
> want to keep things simple. Just use the SPDX license tag for the license.
It would be very helpful if we could just autogenerate the module
license information from the SPDX tags..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists