[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5BiiAwukaVrIvpF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:53:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Daniel Scally <dan.scally@...asonboard.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:02:49AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:10:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...
> >
> > + Cc: Petr, Sergey
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> > > which is a better coding practice.
> >
> > It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
> > fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.
> >
> > Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
> > tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
> > like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).
> >
> > Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Feel free to do that if it's not too late, with:
>
> Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Thank you!
I think it's a bit late for printk tree to consume this. If it's the case
(Petr?) then I will submit a new version after v6.2-rc1 is out.
> I don't think the linkelihood for having a new user for this API is high.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists