[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5B12qBrpHZpuAGx@xpf.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:15:38 +0800
From: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <lczerner@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<heng.su@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Syzkaller & bisect] There is "ext4_xattr_block_set" WARNING in
v6.1-rc8 guest kernel
Hi Jan Kara,
On 2022-12-07 at 11:25:55 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed 07-12-22 16:51:06, Pengfei Xu wrote:
> > Platform: raptor lake
> >
> > There is "ext4_xattr_block_set" WARNING in v6.1-rc8 guest kernel.
> > "
> > [ 27.922337] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1024
> > [ 27.922663] =======================================================
> > [ 27.922663] WARNING: The mand mount option has been deprecated and
> > [ 27.922663] and is ignored by this kernel. Remove the mand
> > [ 27.922663] option from the mount to silence this warning.
> > [ 27.922663] =======================================================
> > [ 27.923771] EXT4-fs: Ignoring removed bh option
> > [ 27.923947] EXT4-fs: Ignoring removed i_version option
> > [ 27.924204] EXT4-fs: Journaled quota options ignored when QUOTA feature is enabled
> > [ 27.925839] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal. Quota mode: writeback.
> > [ 27.928984] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 27.929173] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 567 at fs/ext4/xattr.c:2069 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x170d/0x1770
>
> Thanks for report! I see where the problem is, I just don't see why mount
> API would be really related to that. That is likely just a coincidence
> caused by the particular reproducer from syzbot.
>
> The core of the problem is that we try to expand i_extra_isize on every
> __ext4_mark_inode_dirty() call. Now there are certainly moments when the
> inode is dirtied without setting up quotas - in this case when
> ext4_setattr() was called to modify file permissions but e.g. timestamp
> updates can be another such occasion. If the inode already has enough
> xattrs that after expanding i_extra_isize they don't fit into the inode and
> we need to allocate external xattr block, the warning triggers.
>
> Generally we cannot initialize quotas in ext4_try_to_expand_extra_isize()
> because we may be relatively deep in the call stack and I'd be worried
> about the lock ordering. Also making sure quota is initialized whenever we
> call __ext4_mark_inode_dirty() looks like playing a whack-a-mole game. So I
> think the easiest approach would be bail from expansion if we need to
> allocate block and we don't have quotas initialized. I'll send a patch.
>
Thanks for finding out the root cause of the problem in short time!
This is so cool!
I'm not sure why bisect commit point to "new mount api", and I made
the revert commit on top of v6.1-rc8 failed, so this time bisect could not
100% confirm the bad commit, maybe there are 2 or more commits trigger this
issue.
Anyway, I'm glad it's helpful.
Thanks!
BR.
> Honza
>
> > [ 27.929514] Modules linked in:
> > [ 27.929651] CPU: 0 PID: 567 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.1.0-rc8-76dcd734eca2 #1
> > [ 27.929931] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> > [ 27.930355] RIP: 0010:ext4_xattr_block_set+0x170d/0x1770
> > [ 27.930562] Code: e8 78 18 ff ff 48 8b 7d a0 e8 4f eb e5 ff e9 80 fe ff ff e8 25 3d b5 ff 4c 89 ff e8 fd c2 e9 ff e9 b6 f5 ff ff e8 13 3d b5 ff <0f> 0b e9 21 1
> > [ 27.931241] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fc7a10 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > [ 27.931442] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff816fa04d
> > [ 27.931708] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88800cb6cc80 RDI: 0000000000000002
> > [ 27.931973] RBP: ffffc90000fc7ae8 R08: ffff88800bae3824 R09: ffff88800bae3bfe
> > [ 27.932236] R10: ffffc90000fc7e28 R11: 00000000fa83b201 R12: 0000000000000000
> > [ 27.932502] R13: ffff88800cb85800 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > [ 27.932781] FS: 00007f69b3c68740(0000) GS:ffff88807dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 27.933079] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 27.933296] CR2: 000055c48486e5e8 CR3: 000000000b76a005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
> > [ 27.933569] PKRU: 55555554
> > [ 27.933676] Call Trace:
> > [ 27.933773] <TASK>
> > [ 27.933861] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60
> > [ 27.934048] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x5e9/0xcd0
> > [ 27.934242] __ext4_expand_extra_isize+0x188/0x1f0
> > [ 27.934443] __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x246/0x370
> > [ 27.934637] ? ext4_setattr+0x1380/0x1380
> > [ 27.934794] ext4_dirty_inode+0x7a/0xa0
> > [ 27.934946] __mark_inode_dirty+0xa3/0x650
> > [ 27.935107] ? setattr_copy+0x11e/0x320
> > [ 27.935259] ext4_setattr+0xb26/0x1380
> > [ 27.935407] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60
> > [ 27.935593] ? ext4_journalled_write_end+0x900/0x900
> > [ 27.935792] notify_change+0x3f8/0xb50
> > [ 27.935943] chmod_common+0xef/0x200
> > [ 27.936085] ? chmod_common+0xef/0x200
> > [ 27.936235] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x25/0x60
> > [ 27.936420] do_fchmodat+0x76/0xf0
> > [ 27.936558] __x64_sys_chmod+0x28/0x40
> > [ 27.936713] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
> > [ 27.936862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > [ 27.937062] RIP: 0033:0x7f69b3d8d59d
> > [ 27.937203] Code: 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 8
> > [ 27.937900] RSP: 002b:00007ffccac7eef8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000005a
> > [ 27.938184] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f69b3d8d59d
> > [ 27.938450] RDX: 0031656c69662f2e RSI: 0000000000000140 RDI: 0000000020000100
> > [ 27.938719] RBP: 00007ffccac7ef00 R08: 00007ffccac7ed60 R09: 00000000004028e0
> > [ 27.938985] R10: 00007ffccac7ed60 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004011a0
> > [ 27.939250] R13: 00007ffccac7efe0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > [ 27.939517] </TASK>
> > [ 27.939605] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists