[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40ff1e4c-b128-c0d0-a024-e454e843ee46@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 13:21:47 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] sched/core: Add user_tick as argument to
scheduler_tick()
On 28/11/2022 14:20, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Differentiate between user and kernel ticks so that the scheduler updates
> the IPC class of the current task during the latter.
Just to make sure ,,, 05/22 introduces `rq->curr` IPCC update during
user_tick, i.e. the former?
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists