linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221207150854.2077580-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date:   Wed,  7 Dec 2022 16:08:54 +0100
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To:     x86@...nel.org
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order

From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:00:30 +0100

> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:14:43 +0100
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:09:18PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > > Things are a bit busy in the review queue at the moment.  As always,
> > > > we'd love help reviewing stuff.  So, while you're waiting for us to
> > > > review this, could you perhaps look around and find a series that's also
> > > > hurting for review tags?

[...]

> I know, I got it from the first read :D I try to review stuff I have
> mature knowledge in each day, not that lots of them are from the x86
> ML :s

I was hoping it would hit one of the 6.1 RCs as a fix, oh well :D
Why did some other fixes hit the x86 tree during that time then?

> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards/Gruss,
> >     Boris.
> > 
> > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
> 
> Thanks,
> Olek

Thanks,
Olek