[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5CxBzy47Gjn/V5a@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:28:07 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PXA25x: GPIO driver fails probe due to resource conflict with
pinctrl driver
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:25:53PM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently trying to bring up Linux 6.1-rcX on a PXA255 board, using a
> devicetree. One problem I encountered is that the PXA GPIO driver fails to
> probe because it uses the same MMIO register range as the pinctrl driver:
>
> [ 0.666169] pxa25x-pinctrl 40e00054.pinctrl: initialized pxa2xx pinctrl driver
> [ 0.694407] pxa-gpio 40e00000.gpio: can't request region for resource [mem 0x40e00000-0x40e0ffff]
> [ 0.695050] pxa-gpio: probe of 40e00000.gpio failed with error -16
>
> Before I try to fix this myself: Is GPIO on PXA25x currently expected to
> work and when has it last been seen working?
>
> What would be a good way to fix this?
How are the registers arranged? Is 0x40e00000-0x40e0ffff simply too
large, and making it smaller would fix the issue? Or are the registers
interleaved? It is possible to request a region in a non-exclusive
manor. Or is it more than interleaving, individual registers need to
be shared between the two drivers? If so, you have the locking issues
you mentioned.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists