linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y5C1Hifsg3/lJJ8N@hog>
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:45:34 +0100
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     ehakim@...dia.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, raeds@...dia.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, atenart@...nel.org,
        jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for
 IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink

2022-12-07, 12:10:16 +0200, ehakim@...dia.com wrote:
> From: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> 
> Add support for changing Macsec offload selection through the
> netlink layer by implementing the relevant changes in
> macsec_change link.

nit: macsec_changelink

[...]
> +static int macsec_update_offload(struct macsec_dev *macsec, enum macsec_offload offload)
> +{
> +	enum macsec_offload prev_offload;
> +	const struct macsec_ops *ops;
> +	struct macsec_context ctx;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	prev_offload = macsec->offload;
> +
> +	/* Check if the device already has rules configured: we do not support
> +	 * rules migration.
> +	 */
> +	if (macsec_is_configured(macsec))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	ops = __macsec_get_ops(offload == MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF ? prev_offload : offload,
> +			       macsec, &ctx);
> +	if (!ops)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	macsec->offload = offload;
> +
> +	ctx.secy = &macsec->secy;
> +	ret = (offload == MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF) ? macsec_offload(ops->mdo_del_secy, &ctx) :
> +		      macsec_offload(ops->mdo_add_secy, &ctx);

I think aligning the two macsec_offload(...) calls would make this a
bit easier to read:

	ret = offload == MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF ? macsec_offload(ops->mdo_del_secy, &ctx)
					    : macsec_offload(ops->mdo_add_secy, &ctx);

(and remove the unnecessary ())

> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		macsec->offload = prev_offload;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +

[...]
> +static int macsec_changelink_upd_offload(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *data[])
> +{
> +	enum macsec_offload offload;
> +	struct macsec_dev *macsec;
> +
> +	macsec = macsec_priv(dev);
> +	offload = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD]);

All those checks are also present in macsec_upd_offload, why not move
them into macsec_update_offload as well? (and then you don't really
need macsec_changelink_upd_offload anymore)

> +	if (macsec->offload == offload)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Check if the offloading mode is supported by the underlying layers */
> +	if (offload != MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF &&
> +	    !macsec_check_offload(offload, macsec))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	/* Check if the net device is busy. */
> +	if (netif_running(dev))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	return macsec_update_offload(macsec, offload);
> +}
> +

-- 
Sabrina