[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5C2tXX7OazmJtEq@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:52:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 04:30:00PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> But not every fix is a fix only when it's easy to find a repro,
> right...?
The basic rule is: only regression fixes during the -rc phase.
Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
although there it is not spelled out that it is regressions only. But
this is the rule we adhere to in the tip tree in general.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists