[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221208210929.capfm7jaltxvgpvq@builder.lan>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:09:29 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] clk: qcom: gpucc-sc7280: Add cx collapse reset
support
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:54:39PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 12/7/2022 9:16 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 11:08, Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >> Allow a consumer driver to poll for cx gdsc collapse through Reset
> >> framework.
> > Would you mind extending this commit message, to allow us to better
> > understand what part is really the consumer part.
> Sure. I can do that.
> >
> > I was expecting the consumer part to be the GPU (adreno) driver, but I
> > may have failed to understand correctly. It would be nice to see an
> > example of a typical sequence, where the reset is being
> > asserted/deasserted, from the consumer point of view. Would you mind
> > explaining this a bit more?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc8/source/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c#L1309
> You are correct. The consumer is adreno gpu driver. When there is a gpu fault, these sequences are followed:
> 1. drop pm_runtime_put() for gpu device which will drops its vote on 'cx' genpd. line: 1306
> 2. At this point, there could be vote from either smmu driver (smmu is under same power domain too) or from other subsystems (tz/hyp).
Can you confirm that this is happening completely independent of what
the kernel does?
> 3. So we call into gdsc driver through reset interface to poll the gdsc register to ensure it collapsed at least once. Line: 1309
I other words, if we engineered 1. such that it would wait in
gdsc_disable() until the condition for 3. is reached, that should work
for you? (Obviously depending on the ability for us to engineer this...)
Regards,
Bjorn
> 4. Then we turn ON gpu. line:1314.
>
> -Akhil.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> >> ---
> >>
> >> (no changes since v3)
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Convert 'struct qcom_reset_ops cx_gdsc_reset' to 'static const' (Krzysztof)
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Minor update to use the updated custom reset ops implementation
> >>
> >> drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7280.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7280.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7280.c
> >> index 9a832f2..fece3f4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7280.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-sc7280.c
> >> @@ -433,12 +433,22 @@ static const struct regmap_config gpu_cc_sc7280_regmap_config = {
> >> .fast_io = true,
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static const struct qcom_reset_ops cx_gdsc_reset = {
> >> + .reset = gdsc_wait_for_collapse,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct qcom_reset_map gpucc_sc7280_resets[] = {
> >> + [GPU_CX_COLLAPSE] = { .ops = &cx_gdsc_reset, .priv = &cx_gdsc },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static const struct qcom_cc_desc gpu_cc_sc7280_desc = {
> >> .config = &gpu_cc_sc7280_regmap_config,
> >> .clks = gpu_cc_sc7280_clocks,
> >> .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(gpu_cc_sc7280_clocks),
> >> .gdscs = gpu_cc_sc7180_gdscs,
> >> .num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(gpu_cc_sc7180_gdscs),
> >> + .resets = gpucc_sc7280_resets,
> >> + .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gpucc_sc7280_resets),
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct of_device_id gpu_cc_sc7280_match_table[] = {
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists